Talk:Grave Creek Stone

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jackiespeel in topic Recent research

Bill Stump's Stone?

edit

How is it that the article for Bill Stump's Stone redirects to this page, yet the article here makes no mention of that reading of the stone? Since this reading is the basis for calling the stone a hoax, I think at the bare minimum a simple paragraph on the topic is warranted. 72.67.93.133 (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Andrew Price's 1930 article 'Bill Stump's Stone' was probably a spoof, says Stephen Williams. It certainly wasn't the basis for calling it a hoax, since Reid's article is dated 1879.--Doug Weller (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent research

edit

Does 2008 count as 'recent research'? Jackiespeel (talk) 09:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply