Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 3family6 in topic GA Review
Gravity (Lecrae album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 16, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the first recordings of Gravity began in May 2012? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 12:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I would split the lead into two sections, but that is optional
- ", from the iTunes deluxe edition of the album peaked at" - comma not needed
- Why was the album nominated for Best Gospel Album, yet the genre does not seem to be well-presented on that album
- There are a lot of comments on Rapzilla from people who wonder that too. Basically, it was put in that category because the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category was removed this year. Why the album wasn't put in Best Contemporary Christian Music or Best Rap Album, or both, I don't know. I'll put info in about the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category being removed.--¿3family6 contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- In the infobox, next to Recorded, the m-dash should be an n-dash
- Next to Producer, is it possible to pluralize the word?
- No, unfortunately. I tried.--¿3family6 contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- I think the first paragraph of the Background section includes information that is not relevant to this album. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Background, that section should provide important information that influenced a particular album. Suggest trimming it down, removing all the chart positions and awards. The next paragraph is OK.
- "chiefly The Watchmen, consisting of J.R., Alex Medina, and Wit,[21][24][26] and Heat Academy, which is under the direction of Street Symphony.[21]" - confusing sentence. Is the "and" ahead Wit necessary?
- Clarified.--¿3family6 contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- You link Tedashii twice in that section
- "Billboard included news about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat.[41]" - suggest, Billboard reported about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat
- "This version includes 3 bonus songs featuring appearances from Suzy Rock" - 3 should be three
- ""Mayday" featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones," - add a comma after Mayday
- "featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones" - that is already stated
- Removed.--¿3family6 contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Quotation marks in quotation marks should be converted to apostrophes, like 'Lord Have Mercy'
- "cover as a combination of the covers of" - suggest "of the ones of"
- "and compared the promotional art to the promotional art" - ditto
- References could use some clean-up. Accessdates, publishers are missing, Web notation not needed, Ref 6 one period too much, Ref 65 consists of a bare url
- Two dead links: [1]--Tomcat (7) 12:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Reference issues fixed.--¿3family6 contribs 16:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll get to work right away.--¿3family6 contribs 14:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)