Talk:Gray-tailed vole/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 19:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Notes

Just a couple minor things:

• What's with the coordinates?

That is where the type specimen was taken. Kind of a wonky idea, so I will take them down until I ask what some others think.Gaff (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

• "In Latin, the species name canicaudus derives from canens meaning "gray" and cauda meaning "tail.""

• I think the period needs to be outside of the quotation marks.

I'll check with a grammar guru and sort it out.Gaff (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Other than that, good job! :) --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 19:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Gaff (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.