 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editHow is it that Mystique shot Graydon Creed, when X-Factor had already captured her before he was shot? 71.236.33.191 07:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
the main stream marveluniverse timeframe is it self impossible
- Timetravel and a time-delayed, automatic weapon. See X-Men Forever #2. Dizzy D 16:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, that's WTF even by Marvel standards.
- Timetravel and a time-delayed, automatic weapon. See X-Men Forever #2. Dizzy D 16:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Uncited
editI've seen the statement that Creed was based on neo-nazi Frank Collins in several articles, but never any citation for it. Unless someone can come up with a source for the rumor, it should probably be removed. -- Noclevername 17:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Creed23.jpg
edit
Image:Creed23.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Television
editCan anyone clean up the television section, or at least give it paragraphs? As it is right now it looks pretty long and ridiculous to me.
- Way way too much detail, and anyone who cares enough to come here is likely to not see this. Probably start an edit war if i try to trim it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)