Talk:Graymail
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Graymail article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Classified Information Procedures Act
editThe article states: "The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), a.k.a. the Graymail Law, of 1980 was designed to counter this tactic (meaning #1) by allowing judges to review classified material in secret, so that the prosecution can proceed without fear of publicly disclosing sensitive intelligence." But the linked article seems to point to meaning #2, not meaning #1. The linked article includes the sentence "CIPA was designed to meet the trial tactic of "greymail"—the intimation by a defendant formerly connected to the intelligence community that at trial he may need to disclose classified information." Reading this sentence alone could lead to the conclusion that meaning #1 is intended. But the following sentence is "CIPA requires the defense attorneys to give notice of the classified information they want to use, and it requires the judge to rule on materiality." This suggests that the true intended meaning is #2.
I would change the Wikipedia article myself, but I defer to experts. Anomalocaris 03:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
I went ahead and clarified the language in the text to say "the first tactic above," although I tend to agree with Anomalocaris' interpretation. However, because of many recent newstories using the term "graymail" in relation to the I. Libby Lewis case, I felt that the article needed to read as smoothly as possible until a more substantive revision took place. Gorjus 15:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikileaks
editHas anyone referred to Wikileaks encrypted file as graymail?--Senor Freebie (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Graymail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922140112/http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm to http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922140112/http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm to http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)