Talk:Great Britain road numbering scheme

Refocus of article

Now that we have Roads in the United Kingdom along with the roads list I have cut a lot of the duplicate information and am trying to refocus the article on the numbering scheme. I am really struggling for sources on this, but am adding them as I find them. I would appreciate thoughts, comments about what the scope of the article should be? Do we need a separate Road Network article describing the important A roads for example and keep this purely to the numbering scheme or should we keep them together? Regan123 (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Clear up wording

"The first digit in the number of any road should be the number of the furthest-anticlockwise zone entered by that road." That sentence is one of the most important in the article, because it gets at the heart of the matter of how roads are numbered. But I'm confused (I'm not a Brit) by what is meant by "furthest-anticlockwise." It's a radial pattern; you can go anticlockwise around and around. So furthest from WHERE? Furthest from the 1/6 and 9/7 boundary (in which case you could just say "lowest-numbered zone")? Thanks. 99.37.211.190 (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I struggle with that wording myself sometimes, but I can't think of a good alternative. What it is trying to say is if a road is in zone 6 and zone 5 the furthest anti-clockwise zone on the London radial is zone 5 so the road starts with 5; for a road in zones 5 & 4 the furthest anti-clockwise is 4; zones 4 & 3 produce a 3 road; 3 and 2 produce a 2 road; 2 and 1 produce a 1 road. However "lowest-numbered zone" would not work because a road in zone 1 and 6 produces a 6 road. Road Wizard (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

From Datum. A1 in England SovalValtos (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

'M3 was due to head towards Exeter'

I am going to remove the following sentences.

The latter two might be explained by the original plan for the M3 motorway, which was due to head towards Exeter, rather than Southampton as it does now.

The M3 was never considered to go to Exeter (although it oddly turns southwards near Basingstoke). The only route proposed following that line was proposed in 1936 by the Institute of Highways Engineers.

The original committee which set up the motorway zones chose the boundary of zones 2 and 3 to be the projected line of the M3 towards Exeter, although it's not currently known whether this is still the case.

As above, it was never meant to go there. The boundry between the motorway zoning system lies along the current M3. http://cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/motorways.shtml

Regards, FM [ talk to me | show contributions ]  13:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Britain road numbering scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724050836/http://www.cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/history.shtml to http://www.cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/history.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724050836/http://www.cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/history.shtml to http://www.cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/history.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)