Talk:Great Captain Island Light/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Acalycine (talk · contribs) 02:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail: Comment: Certainly an interesting article about lighthouses, I liked the amount of history put into the article, well done. Acalycine(talk/contribs) 02:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
· · ·

Thank you. This was a fun and surprisingly interesting lighthouse. Normally, one does not expect a stone lighthouse to be severely cracked just a decade into its service life, but the replacement certainly has made up for the hassle I'd say! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)