Talk:Great Kingshill

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.lkvs.org.uk/pages/aboutthevillage.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 20:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Pol430 talk to me 21:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure the village society hasn't copied sections of this article and then copyrighted it? The village website has copyrighted their text as of 2009, however elements of the text you have removed have been in this article since it was created in 2003. See this version of the article from December 2003. -- role^player 20:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict)::You're probably right, I've restored the text. I didn't check the article history, I assumed it was recently created in the same way Little kingshill was. Guess that's what you get for investigating copyright while tired... Signing off. Pol430 talk to me 21:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

These revisions: [1][2][3][4] further show the evolution of the text over time on this site. The village website is in the wrong, not this article. -- role^player 21:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Forgive my vociferous reply, I was an anon editor who created and worked on many of the Buckinghamshire articles before I signed up for this username. Can we also restore the text on Little Kingshill too please? Now that we know it's not copyrighted. -- role^player 21:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Actually scrub that, I'll create a better version at the correct location. -- role^player 21:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)