Talk:Great Lakes College

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Lakes College article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: New South Wales / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal Great Lakes College is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Not much here and no external references. Adam McCormick (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

My modifications

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've just edited the page yesterday as there some problems with privacy concerns.

The anonymous edit of 13/2/08 used many people's names ... it is probably not appropriate to do that, especially as there were no statements regarding permission. It's great that the anonymous editor was so positive, as a staff member, I appreciate it. I also arranged in a more? logical manner and fixed some typos.

Gstokes1 (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic