Talk:Great Lakes Compact
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Lakes Compact article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editI'd like more information regarding the agreement itself. Does it enable new uses of water? Restrict uses of water? What did the compact achieve that was not possible prior to its signing?
Sources
editThis was on my to-do list so I had some sources compiled. Here they are, they may help.
- [1], [2], [3], [4], House bill, Senate bill
--IvoShandor (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll expand with them if I get the chance. FingersOnRoids♫ 22:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I added some more links and an infobox. The USA Today story by Cauchon was actually cited in the House report (110-863) in the background and need for legislation section. Tangurena (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nice job fleshing out the stub a bit. An additional note, for the legislation section: the compact had to pass through each state legislature as well as the federal legislature. Some of the above links are discussing the bill in context of the state house or senate. The section should lend itself well to having a "federal" and "state" subsection. The legislative history of the Great Lakes Compact is sure to be interesting. Again, nice work. :-)--IvoShandor (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Environmental Justice and the Great Lakes Compact
editThere is not a lot of justice for the residents of North Western Racine County and later on the City of Racine Wisconsin. This scholarly Article done by graduate students from the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Fresh Water Science is a clear analysis of the winners and losers in this rich county vs/ poor county scramble for water resources. [5]https://www.cornellpolicyreview.com/waukesha-diversion/?pdf=4789 Dachvid (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)