Talk:Great Southern Bank
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Several ingredients in topic NPOV
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis reads like an advert for CUA. I use CUA, and even I don't think they are that good! In fact, I have a deep suspicion that they are positioning themselves to turn into yet another dreadful Australian bank, exactly like St George did. Just my subjective cynicism, but this article strikes me as overly enthusiastic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.180.37 (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. When I get time I'll look at it. Apparently the page has been this way for a long time. Robert Brockway (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
NPOV
editI have edited this page briefly to remove some of the advertising language. This article had previously used phrases best suited to CUA's website, and not to Wikipedia. Any further input in removing residual puffery is encouraged.Several ingredients (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)