Talk:Great Speckled Bird (band)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jafeluv in topic Move request
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Great Speckled Bird (band) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Move request
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Great Speckled Bird (band) → Great Speckled Bird – Seems sufficiently different from "The Great Speckled Bird" to remove the parentheses suffix and add a sufficient hatnote, linking to the eponymous album and the other dab page. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Another completely counterproductive removal of a tremendously useful qualifier, justified by nothing beyond blind following of a rule. NoeticaTea? 03:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think the "the" doesn't differentiate it enough, and I also think that there's not a primary topic. It would be nice to be able to remove the qualifier, but in this case I think we're better off leaving things the way they are. — Mudwater (Talk) 03:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.