This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Thanks. I added the hickory in Greenwich, which is the only one I know for now. I plan to go around and visit all the other ones in my spare time, using the TimeOut book as a reference.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there. As I keep researching and adding coordinates and pictures, I wonder what's the best platform, in terms of being philosophically close to Wikipedia, to collect them in map format. Would OpenStreetMap's Umap be a reasonable choice? I would then like to link that to the Wikipedia article, so I welcome suggestions in that sense as well - "See also" section? Thanks. 2.100.104.223 (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I have added colour-coding for deceased and limited-access trees, I hope it's a welcome change. I meant to ask, is there a natural order of the trees? If not, I propose alphabetical and pushing all deceased trees at the bottom. The reason is that it will be difficult to get their pictures. Any views? Thanks. 92.4.165.90 (talk) 07:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply