Talk:Greater sooty owl

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Removed Gretater Sooty Owl from other owls section to eliminate black link per wikipedia style. This article is Greater Sooty Owl.--Dakota ~ ° 17:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Please don't remove categories and stubs. --Dakota ~ ° 18:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Some cleanup. Removed ramdom owls list and found and replaced cats that were removed.--Dakota ~ ° 20:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Picture!

edit

The picture of the Sooty Owl at Caversham Wildlife Park has been misidentified. They actually hold Lesser Sooty Owl, and that picture is clearly a Lesser Sooty rather than a Greater. Jubblubs (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greater sooty owl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply