Wikipedia

Talk:Greatest Hits (Lost)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Featured articleGreatest Hits (Lost) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2007Articles for deletionDeleted
December 16, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 22, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

BuddyTV

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

If Buddy TV can be considered a source, surely the flashback (Charlie) and the synopsis should be added Mtowers 15:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

BuddyTV isn't a reliable source; this page will be deleted soon. --thedemonhog talk contributions 23:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Really there's no point in it being deleted seeing as the episode is due to be confirmed by ABC within the next few days Mtowers 13:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Revision

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This synopsis needs a serious clean-up. --Kudzu1 14:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think people are going to be continuously cleaning it up over the next day or two. That's probably common for articles about TV shows that just aired. I just did a lot of cleaning myself. - Shaheenjim 16:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Flashback

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shouldn't the flashback info read that it is both Charlie and Alex/Karl? I mean, they have a flashback as well. Even if it is only for a few minutes. MalionX 10:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mugger

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Attacker.gif
The Mugger In The Alley

Did it look to anyone else like the mugger in the Nadia flashback scene was Keir O'Donnell, who played Thomas, Claire's boyfriend? Can anyone get a screenshot of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.188.231.210 (talk) 17 May 2007 (UTC)

But of course. Here's the screenshot.
I couldn't really get a better shot, but I shall attempt to later. --RgNet 16:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

DS Ring

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I edited the article to say that Charlie's ring was based on his great grandfather's initials. It might've been great, great grandfather, or something like that. I can't remember for sure. Feel free to correct that if I'm wrong. - Shaheenjim 16:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're not "wrong". When Charlie and Liam were discussing it they said something like "it was her father's and his father's before him..." and then trailed off like it should continue, but best of what we know any edit like you're talking about would be right on. Guse 14:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Who are the "Looking Glass" occupants—competing theories

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

On the Lost wiki and elsewhere, theories abound that the women who took Charlie at gunpoint in the "Looking Glass" module are "Dharma Initiative survivors", left since "The Purge" (as seen in "Man Behind the Curtain").

This doesn't make any sense though as Juliet knew about "Looking Glass" (and its blocking signals off the Island) and Ben must have sent people there to do that. If they were "Dharma survivors", they wouldn't help Ben and they wouldn't block signals off the Island; in fact, they could use that same system to send a signal to Hanso or whoever for rescue.

Another theory is that they are "Others" who "displeased" Ben. He sent them down to the "Looking Glass" and that part of the reason he wanted Locke to blow up the submarine, was to trap them there as punishment. That too brings up the question of why they would KEEP blocking signals, which is what Ben wants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.150.208.34 (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

One of them could be emily, from the previous episode? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebigbristolian (talk) 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Please sign your comments. Does it matter who it is? We'll probably find out in the next episode. And who is Bonnie? There's a pic of her in the article, marked 'Bonnie'... I never knew there was a 'Bonnie' in Lost. — « hippi ippi » 04:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The picture is of one of the gun women in the Looking Glass station. No name was given in the show, so I can't think where Bonnie came from. Happy Man C
Bonnie is the name she is given in press material. (142.46.140.149 02:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC))Reply

Naomi

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I might be mistaken, but when Naomi realized that Charlie was in DriveShaft, didn't she say she knew of him because the big deal made "when they found the plane"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.198.241.62 (talk) 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, she's already explained that they've found Flight 815 and the passangers were all dead. We're not sure how this can be, they haven't really explained.75.68.230.251 19:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
That was from the previous episode. - Shaheenjim 22:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Danielle

edit

Why did Jack say he would take her gun, but she couldn't stay? I mean she must be pretty good with the gun and that would be one less 816er that would have to stay and risk their life. It seems like he knows something else that we don't. Maybe about Danielle's relation to the Others...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.250.203 (talk) 18 May 2007 (UTC)

She needed to lead the rest of the Losties to the radio tower. At least, thats the official reason given by Jack. My theory is that he knew there was a possibility she would see Alex and that would cause her to screw up, or that she would in some other way let emotions get in the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.81.116 (talk) 18 May 2007 (UTC)
A less complicated reason would be, that the others are comming to abduct anyone who does not have a Y chromosome, and guess what she doesn't have a Y chromosome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.250.203 (talk) 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Charlie's fourth flashback

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think it should be mentioned that the scene where Charlie is playing the gutar is also in the episode "Flashes Before Your Eyes." The difference was that Desmond did not confront Charlie and ask how he knew him. I think this is a big, yet subtle part of the episode and should be noted. I added it to the notes section. If you don't think I worded it well, feel free to change it. Mr.Kickyourbutt 18:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nope, Charlie is wearing different clothes. 69.255.157.150 03:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:FemaleAttacker.gif

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:FemaleAttacker.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Lost-3x21-TheLookingGlass.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Image:Lost-3x21-TheLookingGlass.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

SilvaStorm has added back this image. Do we need it? I say no. –thedemonhog talk • contributions 19:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal 3x21-hitscap872.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Normal 3x21-hitscap872.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow!

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page has improved soooooo much since the last time I saw it! Well done! Regarding the info on Rose and Bernard, shouldn't we also put that info on their pages. And is there any news if they are going to play a more promininent role in season 4?  Wikirocks  03:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It should be added. As can be seen from the trailers and publicity stills, they will at least appear in season 4. –thedemonhog talk • edits 04:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Guest stars

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The guest stars in the infobox need to have their characters listed. Ophois (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greatest Hits (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Greatest Hits (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Greatest Hits (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Greatest_Hits_(Lost)&oldid=1218282042"