Talk:Greece–Norway relations

comparison tables

these were eliminated a long time ago from bilateral articles, info can easily be obtained by clicking on Greece and Norway. if you wish to include please add to EVERY single bilateral article and see what happens... and a beach picture, many overseas tourists visit Fiji, Samoa, australia for the beaches, do we add photos in these series of bilateral articles? if you agree, please add similar pictures to EVERY single bilateral article and see what happens. simply padding bilateral articles with tangential information not about actual bilateral relations is not necessary. LibStar (talk) 12:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

You make it sound like this was the result of some consensus rather than you trying to edit material out of these articles (while simultaneously trying to delete a bunch of them). I think these comparison tables are fine. They provide relevant information. Ditto with the picture and its informative caption that you removed. At the very least, they don't harm the article. I don't think that pictures and tables would hurt the rest of these articles but that obviously doesn't obligate me to improve them. Unless you can get someone to agree with you I will restore the information you removed from this article in a couple of days.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

add things because they don't harm the article. why not add pictures of all the major Greek tourist attractions?, I'm sure Norwegians have visited them. the comparison tables do not appear on any other bilateral articles. LibStar (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

if you wish to re-add, please add similar content to all bilateral articles, especially pictures of beaches. LibStar (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greece–Norway relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229163547/http://www.fylkesmannen.no/hoved.aspx?m=1166&amid=2913053 to http://www.fylkesmannen.no/hoved.aspx?m=1166&amid=2913053

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)