Talk:Greed/Archives/2014
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 66.57.58.253 in topic Article quality
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Greed. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article quality
This thing needs a stub warning/thingie on it.
This entry seems more like something Gordon Gekko would say than a serious discussion on avarice and greed.
- Indeed. It's also written from a uniquely US perspective: "the desire to acquire wealth has been understood as indispensable for economic prosperity" etc. 84.48.58.93 18:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. This whole thing could be rewritten to be much more interesting and make more sense; it's pretty random as it is. "the desire to acquire wealth has been understood as indispensable for economic prosperity- this is the trickle-down theory"? That has nothing to do with the trickle-down theory. --JdwNYC 02:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that it should be a stub. It also deserves a POV warning. It is rare that an article qualifies for both at the same time.
Why do you think that this article is bias? I am new, and I would like to be better acquanted with the POV rules.
- Oi Moderator these guys are right "the desire to acquire wealth has been understood as indispensable for economic prosperity" is nonsense 86.111.169.120 21:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Try not to remove the add-on of "staple of the American people" bit. It's wholly accurate. Sweetandy 20:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- The third paragraph of this article is not really English. It sounds like it was run through an automatic translator program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.58.253 (talk) 16:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)