Talk:Green Belt Movement

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Larataguera in topic Nov 2022

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 September 2018 and 21 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmcrawfo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hai Freinds,

edit

I am so keen interesed in your Movement which is a relevent need for being existed on earth of all species.My native country is India like Africa it struggles to keep its greenery but all efferts get fail everyday. As seen new economic boom sowed its seed in mud means every where construction spreads its muscle everywhere. Our economy is very vulnerable ,not any strong alternative except human resourses. So keep my freinds an eye to India,give a proper guides to political parties and beurocratics.

I do want keep in touch with your movement and your people from whom i expect latest events,going ons.....

With regards and love

Jolly v a P b NO 12928 Dubai U A E jollieva@yahoo.co.in

Peer Review

edit

Great job on this article so far! It is very detailed and thorough and the organization is easy to follow. Under ‘Movement', it might make more sense to put history first. Since there is only one sentence under the ‘structure' header, perhaps it doesn’t need it’s own section. There are some minor grammatical details to be fixed. Under Activism, be sure to include commas after dates. (e.g. In 1989, the Movement…)

Hshiozak (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

No Need To Worry

edit

This page contains exactly correct information .. I read each and every detail point of and doing some projects on it ... So I know about it .. you can read or take information from this website 103.224.154.210 (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nov 2022

edit

I made significant changes today and added some peer-reviewed sources. The article could still use a lot more and better sources. I think everything after the Background section is completely uncited and could probably be removed. It's mostly just a wall of text and minutia that doesn't seem very notable, though there might be something worth saving. Larataguera (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply