Wikipedia

Talk:Green Line Rivalry

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

Thanks to whomever started this page.

The record is 114-98-15 in favor of BU according to the BC media guide, available online:

http://www.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/bc/sports/m-hockey/auto_pdf/0506opponents

I will update this after this weekends games. May the best team win! --136.167.103.213 23:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have never heard of the term "Green Line Rivalry," even though I lived in Boston for 12 years and was affiliated with BU for 5 years. Does anyone outside of BU or BC use this term? If not, it isn't notable, since you need a third party source that references it. A BU newspaper wouldn't qualify as third party. On Google, I could find no use of the term outside of college papers and sites that scraped this article.

This should probably be merged, as a subsection in the relevant BC and BU articles. Djcastel 14:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Technically The Daily Free Press is a third party, independent of the university itself. BigKennyK 03:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge it with Beanpot. --Bud 07:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bad idea, since this term is used for more than just the Beanpot. In fact it is still used for sports other than hockey. I will make some edits/add some sources to reflect this. 90.27.71.69 22:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The term has been used by the Boston Herald - http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/results.html?st=advanced&QryTxt=\"Green+Line+Rivalry\"&By= BigKennyK 13:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also found refs in the Boston Globe (http://www.boston.com/sports//packages/beanpot/1991.htm), ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=2401000), scout.com (http://providence.scout.com/a.z?s=425&p=2&c=76102). Also, it is referred to distinct from the Beanpot in this book (http://books.google.com/books?id=qeBJur7oC1cC&pg=PA20&lpg=PA20&dq=%22green+line+rivals%22&source=web&ots=J93zBzT9hZ&sig=7EDMI6tJN_uWEqtI8z-ohKSFYI0#PPA11,M1). Loudandtrue (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Boston

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have heard this rivalry called the Battle of Boston. Shouldn't that be mentioned here too? 205.172.21.153 18:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, in fact I suspect "Battle of the Commonwealth" is a typo, since that refers to BC's rivalry with UMass. I'll make the edit. Loudandtrue (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bubcprogrambig.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Bubcprogrambig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image File:BostonCollegeEagles.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Green Line Rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Complete Coverage??

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm curious as to whether this rivalry extends beyond football and men's hockey. Both teams have very good women's hockey programs, with both programs in the top 10 very often. I am lacking knowledge of other programs, but I'm guessing there could be significant expansions. I'm a Massachusetts college hockey fan (UML River Hawks), and enjoyed the piece. Thanks, and regards Bill McKenna (talk) 04:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

It definitely does include the women's ice hockey teams, in fact, as indicated by the lead, it includes all sports between the two universities. However, I don't think the notability of the women's hockey rivalry would merit chronicling every match they play, as the games for the men are done. I happened to see a small section on the minnesota-minnesota duluth women's rivalry on their respective pages but nothing more than that, which leads me to think the "other sports" section could be expanded to include a write-up exclusively for the women. I'm not sure how much information is freely available about the all-time records between the two teams, so I'll look into it on the Hockey East site. Mushh94 (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Line Rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Green Line Rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Line Rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Green_Line_Rivalry&oldid=1207423167"