This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Created under the title 'Green electricity in the United Kingdom' to provide coverage of green electricity retailing. Indeed 'Green electricity retailing in the United Kingdom' could be an alternative title. There are many arguments over how green the electricity is, and this provides the core of the article contents as of now, however 'green electricity' is the commonly used description, as reflected in the titles of most of the external links and references.
For coverage of renewable energy production and related topics, see Category:Renewable energy in the United Kingdom.
Gralo15:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Gralo, there is no such thing as coloured electricity. If "green" should stand for environmentally friendly, sustainable, low GHG-emissions, biogenic, organic, grassy, supercool etc. then we should exactly say so as an encyclopedia. Green is a nice marketing term, which is positively received but not well suited to explain something with precision. --Gunnar (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply