Talk:Greengauge 21

Sources

have now added a few refs from peer reviewed journals, not sure how to get rid of the 'lack of citations box' yet (how many do they need..?) Brianthegiant (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

• I'm afraid that this source is not helpful, as it is both a commercial site and, since it was written by Greengauge's Director, it is also a primary source. I do not see "Greengauge" mentioned by name in the visible portions of either [1] or [2]. It isn't a question of the number of sources it needs, but it needs enough sources to verify that it meets WP:ORG. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

thanks for your advice,we're working on it.. NB Greengauge 21 is mentioned by name in the science direct/cities article and is listed in its citations, but being an academic paper you need a subscription to view the full article, the URL links only to the abstract, nonetheless the science direct article came up on a google search re greengauge so presumably the search engines have an arrangement with the paywall. am continuing to add citations... Brianthegiant (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

...And continuing to add copyvio, by the look of it, e.g.

"A new report says that many passengers could be paying no more than £20, and dismisses claims that High Speed rail will be the preserve of a wealthy elite."

which is seemingly lifted from http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2010/09/15-high-speed-rail-fares-will.html or similar.

This article is pretty much useless.

Haskanik (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.greengauge21.net/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)