Talk:Greenhouse gas emissions by the United Kingdom

File:UK-GHG-emissions-by-sector-1990-2010.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:UK-GHG-emissions-by-sector-1990-2010.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:UK-GHG-emissions-by-sector-1990-2010.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenhouse gas emissions by the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070505095844/http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2007/070131a.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2007/070131a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Missing information on mitigation?

I am missing information on mitigation which I would expect to find either in this article or in the parent article Climate change in the United Kingdom. Also the two articles should be streamlined a bit more so that they match better together. This should be seen as the sub-article to Climate change in the United Kingdom.EMsmile (talk) 06:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

I was hoping another Brit would do this - have added a bit. Needs more. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

I still think it's very inelegant that the content on mitigation is now spread across two articles: this one and the one on Climate change in the United Kingdom. I propose to follow the same template as for the other CC country articles and that would mean placing all of the mitigation content at Climate change in the United Kingdom. EMsmile (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Could the sectoral graph include all GhG?

Negligible mass Thanks for adding the sectoral graph. Although useful I feel at the moment it understates the problem of agriculture. I wonder if you might have time to improve it by including all GhG? Chidgk1 (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Links to notable research

I found this quantification of the UK historic responsibility of interest, if it's not already covered - The UK is more responsible for global warming than any other country – if global carbon dioxide emissions are allocated using per capita calculations. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 04:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

too old I think - a lot has happened since 2014 Chidgk1 (talk) 18:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Should the deforestation section be removed?

I understand there is less palm oil deforestation nowadays Chidgk1 (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

deleted Chidgk1 (talk) 10:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)