This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
@Joe Decker: Just stumbed across this. This is a notable telescope (just google it - you'll find scientific articles and newspaper entries about it), so I hope this draft is accepted soon, and thank you @Lauren Huang: for drafting it! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: Hi Mike! First, I'm not surprised, I'd expect any telescope of this size to have received multiple references providing in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources. Once the article has references showing that, it would be an easy pass. but AfC guidelines don't let me pass it until the article has been so improved. .--joe deckertalk 04:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ahh, there's been an edit. Let me take a second look. --joe deckertalk 04:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Accepted and I did some simple cleanups. Thank you for the ping! --joe deckertalk 04:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Joe Decker: Thanks for taking a look and accepting it. Congratulations to @Lauren Huang: I hope you can continue to expand this article! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ahh, there's been an edit. Let me take a second look. --joe deckertalk 04:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The coordinates look wrong if it is near Thule. Perhaps they are coming wrongly from Wikidata. Or perhaps it is not near Thule at all. Ref claims it is at Apex Station. https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/greenland12m/site/ which does match wikidata. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ref does not claim it's an Apex Station, please read more carefully! Because of the hoped-for move, we are studying the weather at the summit site prior to raising money and moving the telescope. Greg (talk) 08:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)