Talk:Greenwood Laboratory School

Comments on article

A lot of information being added to this article is either unsourced or from the school itself. Not all information about the school is encyclopedic and worth including. The information that is included should be verifiable and notable, ie. something that has been covered by the media or is otherwise significant, substantial and important, and should be included in a neutral and non-promotional way.ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I disagree. The information currently included is pretty broad and informative...and neutral to boot. Just because something didn't make the news doesn't mean it isn't notable or important in the context of the topic. Abog (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I disagree as well, this article is better sourced than most high schools or laboratory schools. Since schools with the exception of higher education do not often make the news(e.g. television, newspaper, web, etc.) about their academic programs to the specific nature that the school itself does within its own literature and or publications, it is sometimes necessary to cite directly from the school. These publications are primary sources, meaning they are from the time and are government publications since the institution does receive public funding. Athletic records are records at that, and the results of them do not indicate bias whatsoever. Words and phrases like "better than, worse than, is superior than, inferior to, etc." would indicate bias. Also please indicate with specificity what information is unsourced. Just because something is unsourced at the time does not mean it to be untrue, it could possibly mean that research is being done within the wiki community on that particular piece of information. Pjb1015 (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

well if its wrong, just ask me and i might be able to fix it, i am curre tly a Junior at Greenwood lab and have been going here since kindergarten DragonMaster9817 (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)