This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greg Gianforte article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Greg Gianforte has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 6, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This biography of a living person has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
GA Review
editGA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Greg Gianforte/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 05:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- All of the claims on this article, including all controversial claims, are fully referenced.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- This article covers his entire life from his business activities to political career in a reasonable length. I would also like to congratulate whoever did it for fleshing out the sections on his congressional campaigns as most representative articles only include a short blurb that amounts to "he ran for reelection and got x votes for x percent".
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I am impressed by the neutrality of this article. The sections on his creationist beliefs and his journalist assault are not biased towards or against him.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The majority of edits for the past few months are less than 50 bytes excluding bot edits or the addition of his gubernatorial campaign.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A great selection of images from election results, old images of him, his congressional photos, and his mugshot after the journalist assault.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article is suitable for GA status. Its coverage of his political career is fully fleshed out with all of his campaigns being reasonable long, his business activities are adequately summarized, there are no spelling or grammatical mistakes, there is no bias towards or against him especially in the controversial sections, and I see nothing else that would prevent it from reaching GA status.
- Pass/Fail:
- For a GA, the lead was disorganized and weak before I revamped it. 24.29.56.240 (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)