Talk:Greggs/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Greggs. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Greggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100116091108/http://www.greggs.co.uk:80/about_us/history to http://www.greggs.co.uk/about_us/history/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Drive-by tagging
A series of IPs (probably just sock puppets of one editor) keep adding drive-by tags to this article. A lot of good work has gone into this article over many years: it is well referenced and pretty comprehensive in the context of the specialist nature of the product. The perpetrator of the drive-by tagging has made no attempt to improve the article or to specify exactly how, in his / her view, it needs improving. I think we are getting to the point that the article needs protection. Views welcome. Dormskirk (talk) 22:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- I agree. Normal drive-by tagging is quite bad enough, but repeated placement of tags like this, without any willingness to engage by improving the article or discuss on talk, is unusual and undoubtedly disruptive. William Avery (talk) 23:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)