Talk:Grey-necked rockfowl/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jamietw (talk · contribs) 07:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC) I hope to review the article later today. Jamietw (talk) 07:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Now the spellings are fixed I see no further problem with this point.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Well laid out.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Pass
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Pass
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Covers all the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Focused and concise.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Mainstains a Neutral Point of View throughout.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit warring recently.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All pictured tagged.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All pictures have captions and are relevant.
	7. Overall assessment.	A good article. I feel that most of the issues raised in the last review have been fixed. Just keep an eye on the mix of British and American English.

Nomination on hold until issues with criteria 1a are fixed. Jamietw (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I have fixed them myself. Jamietw (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)