Talk:Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp.
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Dpbjinc in topic Part of Case Overturned?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part of Case Overturned?
editIn SCO v. Novell, the court ruling (found here) states:
Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp., 383 F.3d 965, 967-68 (reversing district court’s holding that plaintiff could not bring a breach of contract claim when copyright infringement claim was dismissed)
on lines 5-7 of page 70. I'm not sure if this will impact this article or not. Dpbjinc 03:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)