Talk:Groton Monument/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Acalycine (talk · contribs) 01:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Final commentary: Another interesting article, a pleasure to review. There was a problem with a date reading "July 1st" which I've replaced with "July 1" which was in error according to the Manual of Style. Passed. Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 01:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, @Acalycine:. And thanks for catching the error. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)