Talk:Grounded (opera)/GA1
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Heavy Grasshopper in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 18:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be reviewing this article, it looks very interesting. Comments to follow shortly using the table below. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 18:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Heavy Grasshopper, I have completed an initial review. I don't think there's much work required to get it to GA :) Do let me know if you have any questions! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 15:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Unexpectedlydian Thanks for your thorough review. I think I have made most of the changes you thought would be helpful. I'm not sure what you had in mind regarding the image captions.
- I don't think "Observor" and "Sensor" have anything helpful to link to. In the Broadway World review, Friscic does refer to the opera as a whole as ground-breaking, in the subtitle and the last line of the review. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Heavy Grasshopper, thank you for addressing the changes and clarifying the points above. I have made a few minor adjustments to the article, including adding alt descriptions (descriptions of images which are accessible to people using screen-readers). Happy to pass the article as GA now, good job! :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 15:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Heavy Grasshopper, thank you for addressing the changes and clarifying the points above. I have made a few minor adjustments to the article, including adding alt descriptions (descriptions of images which are accessible to people using screen-readers). Happy to pass the article as GA now, good job! :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 15:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
I've made a few minor changes throughout to spelling, and to make sure that quotations match the source text. Background
Synopsis
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead Layout Words to watch Fiction List incorporation
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Source check General comments
Reliable source comments
Background
Synopsis
Performance history and reception
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |