Talk:Group 5 (motorsport)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Group 5 (racing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110307090912/http://homepage.mac.com/frank_de_jong/Pages/part2.html to http://homepage.mac.com/frank_de_jong/Pages/part2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715142147/http://www.racing65.com/greatracingcars/celica1.html to http://www.racing65.com/greatracingcars/celica1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306161139/http://qv500.com/bmwm1p6.php to http://www.qv500.com/bmwm1p6.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group 1 (racing) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Homologation

@SpacedFarmer

What source can agree that any Group 5 cars attained homologation for any 'generation'? Generally, only production cars went through this (Groups 1-4). Rally Wonk (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Additionally, how long would the full list of cars be? Is it better to be a new list article? Rally Wonk (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Never thought of it, but I think so. IIRC that you could get the homologation for Gr B via the FIA website SpacedFarmer (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Group B was for production cars but low initial volume (200 cars), and evolutions allowed for significant changes. However, this isn't the Group B article. There are no Group 5 cars listed on the FIA historic database of homologations. Rally Wonk (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I just noticed this too (been on the website). SpacedFarmer (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

This External link shows in 1976, cars had to first be homologated in groups 1-4. Could be different in 1970-1971, I will check the yearbook but was very short lived. For this list to stand, we need a reputable source confirming each car was recognised in Group 5. And change "homologated" word. Rally Wonk (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I agree with that, I had to remove some of that as I checked on RSC that were found not to be Gr 5 cars, such as the Ferrari. SpacedFarmer (talk) 20:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Having some thought, what I now thinking is that it would be better to remove the list. The Super Silhouette cars is best removed as none of the Nissans met FIA guidelines. SpacedFarmer (talk) 12:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I agree with the removal of the list. Rally Wonk (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Group 5 cars don't need to be homologated, therefore there would be no record available of a non-existent homologation. If a car existed as a Group 1, 2, 3, or 4 homologation, then it was legal in Group 5. However, this doesn't change that the list was meant to show examples of the cars built to Group 5 regulations. This is no different than List of Group C sports cars which lists cars built to Group C regulations, despite there being no homologation. The³5₉ (Talk) 18:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

For the record, I looked in one FIA Yearbook (1971 I think?), there is a list of homologated cars in Group 5 but this was such a short generation that was already cancelled as soon as it was introduced. I'm not sure if there is demand for it. Rally Wonk (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Also, I say get rid of Racing Series that included FIA Group 5 cars also because most other article about racing classes don't have them except super touring. SpacedFarmer (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Group GT3 The³5₉ (Talk) 15:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. It is useful and should be elsewhere too. Rally Wonk (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

The purpose of removal is that the first three of those have 1 or 2 championships. As for 4th gen, 2 of those are the same; IMSA never complied with FIA regulations, neither did SS in many cases. One of those is for obsolete Gr. 5 cars. It is basically rather nonsensical to have some of those in the list. Is there a reliable source to prove this, certainly for WCM. SpacedFarmer (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)