This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Ryan et al. (2012) is now in print and names "Gryphoceratops", not Gryphognathus. Could this mean Gryphognathus is preoccupied? There's no mention of this in the paper, and the name Gryphognathus doesn't even appear in the new version.[1] The only other use I could find is for a lungfish in Primitive Fishes (2007)[2], but apparently it's a misspelling of Griphognathus.[3]Smokeybjb (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeh, you're right. I don't know why they have changed the name, but it seems like Gryphognathus is a nomen nudum. I'll redirect the pages. Rnnsh (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
