Talk:Guadalajara, Spain

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2A00:5400:F007:F777:C053:AE8D:6504:1221 in topic Investigate "river of poo"
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guadalajara, Castilla-La Mancha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guadalajara, Castilla-La Mancha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2 May 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:11, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply



Guadalajara, Castilla–La ManchaGuadalajara, Spain – "Spain" is a shorter and (for most people) more meaningful disambiguator than "Castilla–La Mancha". Every topic linked in Guadalajara (disambiguation) in connection to Spain also relates to Castilla–La Mancha, so... "Guadalajara, Spain" is as ambiguous as "Guadalajara, Castilla–La Mancha". The article is probably the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC among those in connection to Spain. Asqueladd (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@King of Hearts: I am not aware of such convention. But if "Guadalajara, Castilla–La Mancha" is following some kind of naming convention within wikipedia, then Córdoba, Spain ("Córdoba, Andalusia"?), Toledo, Spain ("Toledo, Castilla–La Mancha"?), Mérida, Spain ("Mérida, Extremadura"?), Jaén, Spain ("Jaén, Andalusia"?), Santander, Spain ("Santander, Cantabria"?) and Cartagena, Spain ("Cartagena, Region of Murcia"?) are not following it. "Guadalajara, Castilla–La Mancha" looks like the outlier, if we compare this case to the most known cases of placename ambiguity of Spanish geographical names (for cities).--Asqueladd (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support then. -- King of 13:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Investigate "river of poo"

edit

Kindly investigate creidibility of the claim that the Arabic origin of the word conveys "river of poo" (lajara) due to presence of muddy river then. 2A00:5400:F007:F777:C053:AE8D:6504:1221 (talk) 06:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply