Talk:Guanacaste Province
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The article states that usted (formal) is used instead of tú (informal) upon initial meetings. However, usted is universally used in formal situations and it is vos (informal) that is used instead of tú (informal) in several countries including Costa Rica. Am I wrong here?
- Somewhat...in some parts of Costa Rica it's rare to use "tú" or "vos" and "usted" is used for second person regardless of who you are talking to. While you are right on the traditional use of this in formal and informal conversations, Costa Rican Spanish is the exception in this.--Bernalj90 (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Hotelguanacastecostarica.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Hotelguanacastecostarica.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guanacaste Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402103951/http://www.inec.go.cr/A/MT/Poblaci%C3%B3n%20y%20Demograf%C3%ADa/Nacimientos/Publicaciones/C0/01-%202013/Publicaciones%20de%20Estad%C3%ADsticas%20Vitales.pdf to http://www.inec.go.cr/A/MT/Poblaci%C3%B3n%20y%20Demograf%C3%ADa/Nacimientos/Publicaciones/C0/01-%202013/Publicaciones%20de%20Estad%C3%ADsticas%20Vitales.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)