This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article is a duplicate of Guarani aquifer. That article is more political and possibly POV. However, the film reference might be valid and worthy of inclusion. I think the capitalisation of this article title is better, but what do you think? Should we merge the two articles and retain Guarani aquifer as a redirect, or vice versa?. An alternative is to relocate the content to a page following the format of Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System. Opinions? --ChrisJMoor 03:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm all for the merge, because it's confusing to have two different articles on the same topic. Psychade 15:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)