Talk:Guernsey Airport
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guernsey Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neutrality of the article
editThis article has clearly been written to politically support Guernsey airport expansion. This article cites one fact of an aircraft overrunning the runway threshold. This event is used as a justification to expand the runway, and is a minor fact presented in isolation. There are many other incidents over the long and interesting history to the airport which have been completely left out. The airport expansion is actually very controversial and is not supported by the local residents affected by the runway extension. ManOnClaphamOmnibus (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guernsey Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120806030459/http://www.gov.gg/airport2040 to http://www.gov.gg/airport2040
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)