Talk:Guess (company)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes
edit- Moved from Guess? to Guess (clothing) for the reason that the question mark is no longer even used in their logo (only in their press releases) in addition to the article being written with the question mark, you are not sure where sentences begin and finish. Uploaded their current logo (without a quesiton mark). I left the offical style, GUESS? (in caps and with a question mark, at the top of the page). Epson291 03:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Guess Girls
editThere should be a guess girls template in chronological order.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Article rated B-Class?
editWhat substantiates this? It's poorly written, uses considerable peacock language, includes a long list of red-linked models, quotes uncited rumors, has a broken photo link, contains considerable original research. What about this article is commendable?
Guess
edit"Luxury Fashion" brand?
They sell it at like sears and target, I think it's gone waaay downhill.
Terrible Article
editThis article is a train wreck, and it reads like it was written by a non-native English speaker. Wuapinmon (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Dear, @Wuapinmon, Give me a constructive argument, to understand you better, as that doesn't help me much. 177.105.90.20 (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, friend. I don't recall what I'd said from 13 years ago. I'll see if my comment still applies and offer a better argument compared to not offering anything in my prior critique. Wuapinmon (talk) 23:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Guess (clothing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ratm.com/new2/timeline/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321183508/http://www.skmoda.sk/hodinky/guess-hodinky.html to http://www.skmoda.sk/hodinky/guess-hodinky.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)