Talk:Guilla of Provence

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Agricolae in topic Genealogical criticism

Untitled

edit

I'm not sure whether "Louis III of Italy" should link to this page: Louis the Younger. Oh, wait, probably not? Both have been called "Louis III" apparently, but they have different fathers? --Coppertwig 01:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's OK, Marrtel fixed it; it's Louis the Blind. --Coppertwig 01:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistency between articles

edit

This article states that Guilla was Hugh of Italy's consort, while Hugh's page does not mention Guilla once. Meanwhile, Rudolph I of Burgundy's page states that she did indeed marry Hugh. In addition to other marriage inconsistencies on Hugh's page, this one simply seems to be missing entirely. PutinOnTheRitz (talk) 18:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

It does, as Willa. 50.37.98.45 (talk) 01:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Genealogical criticism

edit

I am removing this text from the article, as it reads like Original Research. I would be happy to have it restored, with appropriate citation:

Furthermore, genealogies that are regarded mostly as wishful thinking by critical research, have for centuries claimed that:
  • Guilla's mother is claimed to be Ermengard of Italy. This, however, is fairly unlikely, as Ermengard's marriage with Boso took place in 878, a date when Guilla was likely already born.
  • Guilla was the only wife of Rudolf I of Burgundy. This is not certain, as she possibly was yet of an age capable of child-bearing at her marriage in 912 with the count Hugh, the future Italian king; and her first husband, the King Rudolf, is mentioned as having several children already by 888 (who thus could have been born of an earlier, to us unknown, wife of Rudolf).

Agricolae (talk) 20:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply