Talk:Gums

Title

This should be at "gums", not "gingiva". -205.153.156.226 00:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely incorrect! "Gums" should be redirected here. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely incorrect DRosenbach. Gums and gingivae should be cross referenced. Dangnad (talk) 23:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Structure

Someone who has knowledge in this area should talk a bit aobut the structure of the gingiva. i.e the different types of epithelium (junctional epithelium etc), the underlying connective tissue etc.

Missing Source

Seems like somebody copied from "Carranza's Clinical Periodontology" without writing the source in here

"The interdental gingiva occupies the gingival embrasure, which is the interproximal space beneath the area of tooth contact. The interdental gingiva can be pyramidal or can hav a "col" shape. In the former the tip of one papilla is located immediately beneath the contact point; .... etc."

212.201.112.130 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC).

Basic Editing

The diagram entitled "Gingiva" does not show the gingivae, while the diagram below DOES illustrate the gingivae but doesn't have a title. Several words are misused here in my opinion, e.g. 'keratinized'. I think this article should be totally deleted and and erased from our minds then rewritten by someone with a knowledge of gum and teeth anatomy. Also, if I were doing it, I'd do something here about gingiva, sing; gingivae, pl. Dangnad (talk) 23:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 28 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: To be Moved. Note: requires technical assistance, which I will request at WP:RMT (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Gingiva → Gums – I propose a move to the WP:COMMONNAME for gingiva ("gums") that readers are more familiar with, and away from the scientific name. "Gums" currently redirects here. "Gums" is unlikely to be confused with the chewable gum because chewable gum is an uncountable noun. I look forward to the comments from other editors. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• Support. Keep the hatnote. SSTflyer 13:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
• Support – This is not the Latin Wikipedia. We ought use the names that people use and know. RGloucester — ☎ 17:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
• Support Common name. Randy Kryn 23:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
• Support. Obvious common name. Calidum ¤ 02:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gums. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917134316/http://ada.org/sections/scienceAndResearch/pdfs/patient_79.pdf to http://www.ada.org/sections/scienceAndResearch/pdfs/patient_79.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)