Talk:Gun Owners of South Africa

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nice anti-white jab

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

>Its first meeting, under leader Charl van Wyk, was held in a Cape Town suburb, attended by 100, largely middle-aged white males. (Current article)

Is this really necessary? It seems that this criticism of a gun rights group in South Africa was used as an opportunity to be blatantly anti-white. I've read GOSA's Website, and there was nothing in it to suggest that them wanting to scrap the Firearms Act and amend the South African Constitution to protect RKBA would in any way amount to some kind of anti-black measures (that's the implication that it gives rather than outright saying so). In fact, I don't see how it would do anything except empower law-abiding black (and white) gun owners to be able to legally use firearms for self-defense in South Africa. 2601:8C:4101:C7C2:ED3D:B6D4:F8EB:BBFA (talk) 05:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic