Talk:Guna
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Aviram7 in topic Requested move 1 January 2024
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 1 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Guna to Guna. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 1 January 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Guna (disambiguation) → Guna – No clear primary topic, the Hindu concept has 3,331 views but the people have 3,954, the district has 2,103, the place in India has 1,545, the Lok Sabha constituency has 1,291, the film has 258, the knife has 151, the Vidhan Sabha constituency has 97, the Jainism concept has 49 and the woreda one has 15[[1]]. Google, Images and Books seems moxed. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom, pageview graph. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 05:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm. https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&start=2015-07&end=2023-11&pages=Gu%E1%B9%87a%7CGuna%7CGuna_(disambiguation) says that fewer and fewer people are clicking the hatnote. The weird part is that pageviews somehow fails to distinguish the traffic for Guṇa from the one for the Guna redirect. https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Gu%E1%B9%87a says there were 49 identified clickstreams to the disambiguation page while total traffic was 5k. https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Guna_%28disambiguation%29 in turn can only identify clicks to Gunaa, the 1991 film. I suppose the current primary redirect could be replaced since there's a diacritic so WP:SMALLDETAILS applies, but we would definitely have to monitor the traffic patterns afterwards, because this is hardly conclusive. --Joy (talk) 09:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't see an obvious primary topic here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.