Talk:Gunay Mammadzada

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gunay Mammadzada/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 21:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit

Early life and background

edit

Chess career

edit

2009-14

edit
  • FIDE rating through the International Chess Federation (FIDE) Kind of awkward to have the acronym come after its first introduction
  • Comma after "higher-rated Russian players"
  • Comma after "She scored 5/9 at the former event"
  • Three sentences in a row in the second paragraph begin with 'She"; the middle one can probably be changed to "Mammadzada"
  • Comma after "record by Turkan Mamedyarova"

2015-present

edit

National representation

edit
  • "to finish in fifth place on the second board behind only male players." → "to finish in fifth place on the second board, the highest place of any female entrant."

Playing style

edit

Personal life

edit
  • "Mammadzada's chess idol is Magnus Carlsen, and her other childhood chess idol was Judit Polgár." → "Mammadzada's chess idol is Magnus Carlsen, and she has also named Judit Polgár. as an inspiration." (best guess from the machine translation about how to get at the heart of what you're trying to say without repeating "chess idol")

References

edit
  • Very good!

General comments

edit
  • All pictures used are CC and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks great at 2.9%

Putting on hold for now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and please let me know when you're finished. — GhostRiver 00:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, GhostRiver! I addressed everything above, agreed with most things. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Re-pinging GhostRiver because I think I messed up the ping the first time. Apologies if you get notified twice. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for making those changes, passing now! — GhostRiver 01:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply