Talk:Guyana–United States relations

Untitled

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

RED FLAG? I questioned an old friend who was US Ambassador to Guyana in the 1990s (now retired) about this entry. It is not quite what it seems. Most of it was in fact lifted from information publicly available through the State Department, but the paragraph on "political activism" is a propaganda puff from a lobby called Guyana, USA, whose website is provided. That website seems full of wildly-exaggerated dysinformation about the extent of Guyanese emigration to the US. The "political activism" paragraph should therefore be removed -- but once it is, the whole entry collapses into an unnecessary appendage to the main entry on "Guyana." . 2old bill (talk) 15:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

So "your old friend" is the quality source that substantiates the removal? This needs to be restored, otherwise it is vadalism, as this activism does indeed exist. The party that represents that , which was cited as the primary source, proves it. You calling it a "propaganda puff" is your own opinion, as is calling the party that advocates it (GuyanaUSA) and lobbies for it into question while at the same time offering no actual arguments. President Trump just recently signed an order that eliminated the need for Guyanese people to have a visa to travel to mainland U.S.A, this fact alone proves that there is definitely something going on that warrants the existence of that section that mentions the deepening ties and all the related movement and activism regarding this fact. Source: http://usa-television.com/donald-trump-signs-a-visa-free-travel-policy-for-guyana/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:B44:D60:7DCA:EB1D:166:48A7 (talk) 00:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guyana–United States relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141014221933/http://georgetown.usembassy.gov/ to http://georgetown.usembassy.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

No mention of US intervention in the 60s

There is no mention of American intervention in the 1960s, which was very important in shaping the relationship with America and Guyana </https://www.hamilton.edu/news/story/u-s-intervention-in-british-guiana-a-cold-war-story> TablemannDanny231 (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)TablemannDanny231-2/25/2021