A fact from Gvat appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 437 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Gvat. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.bh.org.il/NAMES/POW/Bergstein.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Merge
editI don't have any strong feelings about this, but what about merging this with Jebata? From what I can see, they are both about the same place. Now we have two rather skimpy articles, wouldn't it be better with one decent size article? Huldra (talk) 21:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. Number 57 11:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Seeing that Jebata was purchased in whole (except for the buildings) and Gvat was built in its place.Icewhiz (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, if no-one protests, I will start to merge the info from Jebata into this article in a day or two, Huldra (talk) 21:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@Huldra: per this file, they were adjacent but different locations. Looking at the satellite maps today, the area of old Jabata has still not be built over.
I was thinking of starting articles on all the historical villages that were depopulated as a result of the Sursock Purchases. What do you think?
Onceinawhile (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Onceinawhile, well, I still don't have any strong feelings about the issue :-). I assume the Jebata land is part of Gvat land today (How far are the ruins from the centre of Gvat; some hundred meters, at most?) Anyway, if you want to write an article about it; go ahead (I assume you have some more material than we had back in 2017?) Huldra (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)