Talk:GwangjuSongjeong station
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GwangjuSongjeong station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 5 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gwangju Songjeong station. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Opening date ?
edit1913 or 1914... Both dates given; one in infobox, one in article text Which is correct ? GrahamHardy (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gwangju Songjeong Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006013022/http://ktx.korail.go.kr/eng/index.html to http://ktx.korail.go.kr/eng/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071107025448/http://ktx.korail.go.kr/eng/flash/map.swf to http://ktx.korail.go.kr/eng/flash/map.swf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Gwangju Songjeong Station
editUsing uppercase Station for this is the consensus per Talk:Seoul Station#Requested move 2 May 2020. Sawol (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- No, it's not. Dicklyon (talk) 16:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 5 July 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 21:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
GwangjuSongjeong station → Gwangju Songjeong station – The CamelCase version does not appear in English-language sources, while the space-separated and hyphen-separated versions do; or perhaps the hyphen should be a dash since Gwangju and Songjeong-dong are the names of the places served. Dicklyon (talk) 16:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment in the pic in the infobox, the camel casing appears to be how the station's name is actually spelled. Maybe English language sources differ per WP:COMMONNAME, which can override the official spelling, but you'd need to provide evidence to prove that the space is the common name. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Based on the pictures on Commons that clearly show the name, the CamelCase is the most common and exclusive on signs meant to be seen from a distance. There are some close-up signs that have a (narrow) space, but they are in the minority. Two minutes on google has found exactly two English-language sources that are not obviously unreliable, both just passing mentions - the first[1] is clearly reliable and uses "Gwangjusongjeong", the second[2] may or may not be reliable and uses CamelCase. This is not much evidence on which to draw a conclusion (but more than the vague wave towards sourcing provided by the nomination) but it does not indicate that the current title is incorrect. Thryduulf (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: I think a discussion could lead to a consensus on the title, but will take some source digging from editors. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)