Talk:Gyeongseong

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Aervanath in topic Requested move

Suggestion for merge

edit

Les talk about it at Talk:Names of Seoul --Appletrees (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why not Keijo?

edit

It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.Elmor_rus (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was merge to Names of Seoul. This can be accomplished by any interested editor. See also Talk:Names of Seoul, where this has already been discussed. Aervanath (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply



GyeongseongKeijo — Relisting to gain more input. Jafeluv (talk) 06:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

As I said before, this article is about the time then Korea was a part of Japan, so it seems to be more natural to call the city in Japanese way. Also, according to Google, "Keijo" is used 10 times more often than "Gyeongseong" and old maps, such as this one use the name "Keijo". Elmor_rus (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.