Talk:Hà Tĩnh province

Literal meaning

Does the literal meaning mean "still river" or "quiet river"? The noun appears to come first and the adjective second, which would be more typical of indigenous Viet phrases rather than Sino-Vietnamese. Badagnani 15:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Second move again contrary RM, RfC, admin db-G6 reversal

This page was moved by 07 October 2011 db-G6 "uncontroversial move" counter 3 RMs at Talk:Cà Mau, including counter 07 August 2011 30 days prior. The db-G6 was reverted here:

12:25, 27 August 2012‎ Edgar181 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (331 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Edgar181 moved page Talk:Ha Tinh province to Talk:Hà Tĩnh Province over redirect: reverting my G6 move/delete because the requested move was not uncontroversial as claimed)

But moved a second time by same user contrary recent RfC 23 to 16 (or 10) majority in favour of Vietnamese names in title here:

(cur | prev) 08:34, 7 December 2012‎ Kauffner (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (331 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Kauffner moved page Talk:Hà Tĩnh Province to Talk:Ha Tinh Province: Correspond to Ha Tinh (city)) (undo)

The argument "Correspond to Ha Tinh (city)" only serves to show that 4 December Ha Tinh city was also moved, also a second time counter 3xRMs at Talk:Cà Mau, and contrary recent RfC majority, and contrary VIETCON which is a draft under discussion. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Numerous sources refer to this subject as "Ha Tinh Province" without diacritics. See VOV Online, U.S. Geological Survey, or Ha Tinh Province Participatory Poverty Assessment Report. Oxford's Atlas of the World doesn't mention the province, but it does give the city as "Ha Tinh" (p. 236). Kauffner (talk) 04:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Kauffner,

This isn't an RM discussion, If you want an RM, put in an RM.

This is a two-bite-at-the-cherry misuse of db-G6 to acheive, twice, an undiscussed move counter RM, contrary RfC.

In ictu oculi (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I know you don't actually care about the title, but I was assuming good faith. Kauffner (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Kauffner, that sort of talk and ignoring of the issue does not achieve anything. Normally if an editor were operating in good faith then they would respect other editors, respect RM results, respect RfC majorities, respect the usage instructions for db-G6 "uncontroversial moves," respect admin reversal of such moves, etc. That is the issue. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bac Ninh Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hà Tĩnh Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150706154400/http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=512&idmid=5&ItemID=14277 to http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=512&idmid=5&ItemID=14277

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Emblem of Hatinh Province.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Emblem of Hatinh Province.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)