Talk:H. J. R. Murray

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Board and table games C‑class Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Indian Origin Theory

I am removing the statement that Murray was the first to publish the theory of Chess's Indian origin. Anyone who reads his book will know that this theory was posited long before him, by Antonius van der Linde, Thomas Hyde, Sir William Jones, etc.

Revision

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What "revision" has Murray's theory that chess began in India undergone? As far as I know, A History of Chess is still considered an authoritative source on the history of chess. If this is referring to the theory that chess originated in China, although that theory has a few adherents, it is generally rejected by chess scholars as lacking evidence. Quale 06:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

A good summary can be found in Michael Mark's article "The Beginnings of Chess," free available online with a google search. If you read that document, you will also see that it is incorrect that HJR Murray was the "first" to publish the theory that chess originated in India. This came almost 250 years earlier with Thomas Hyde (although I haven't read the text), and was even recorded in Sir William Jones' Asiatic Researches. Murray is very up-front about the fact that he is getting this information from professional Orientalists. [User: Guest] 13:04 13 Feb 2016 (EST)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on H. J. R. Murray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215144848/http://www.chesscafe.com/TIM/kibb.htm to http://www.chesscafe.com/TIM/kibb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic