Talk:HDMS Niels Juel (1918)
HDMS Niels Juel (1918) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 27, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HDMS Niels Juel (1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113214657/http://www.milhist.dk/besattelsen/august29/safari_uk.htm to http://www.milhist.dk/besattelsen/august29/safari_uk.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201233849/http://milhist.dk/vaaben/shipdata/nelsjul.html to http://milhist.dk/vaaben/shipdata/nelsjul.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HDMS Niels Juel (1918)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
This article is in good shape. I have a few comments:
- I've made a few tweaks, feel free to revert or further improve
- HDMS needs some sort of explanation/note. What does it stand for? Perhaps something like what is commonly done for SMS?
- should Nordland be bolded in the lead as an alternative name?
- I never bother.
- suggest "Like
the precedingthat class" if that is what is being referred to. - "but was intended" is but the right word here? Perhaps "and"?
- "eight 10.5-centimeter (4.1 in) guns?
- "the main armament to 15-centimeter"?
- displacement doesn't match between infobox and body
- 50 millimeter
s - 10–20 millimeter
s - link flagship at first mention in the body
- add a sentence explaining what happened with her between the German invasion and 1943
- Source doesn't say other than she was training in 1943.
- File:Niels Juel artilleriskib 1923-1943.jpg needs a publication date for the US PD tag
- same for File:Niels Juel (1918) Plan.jpg
- same for File:Niels Juel 1918 420.jpg
- same for File:Niels Iuel attacked by German planes 29 August 1943.jpg
- same for File:Nordland.jpg
- Shit, I always forget that I need to meet all three bullet requirements for the URAA license. I'm gonna claim though that the diagram, as a government doc, doesn't need to be formally published, so we have to use date of creation which was, I suspect, was around 1922.
That's me done, placing on hold for the above comments to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Everything done except the pics which I'll do shortly. Thanks for the thorough review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Found a good pic.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Great, those images look fine now. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Found a good pic.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)