 | HD 205739 b has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that because of its elongated orbit, the maximum surface temperature of the extrasolar planet HD 205739 b is thought to vary by about 100 °C? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HD 205739 b/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk • contribs • count) 18:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll give the article a read through now and raise any points below. Outside of the GA process I'd recommend using webcite to save your references as there is only two of them and if one went down then it'd affect the article greatly. Miyagawa (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I've had a read through, and there isn't many issues - in fact there's just one and it's relatively minor. The line in the lead about the surface temperature needs to be repeated in the Characteristics section. Once that's done, I'm happy to pass this as a GA. Miyagawa (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've fixed that one little tidbit, and will try to use Webcite to archive the links. Perhaps later, though, when I'm not on the way out the door. :P I didn't even know that website existed until you told me!
- In any case, thank you for the review. I appreciate it. --Starstriker7(Talk) 14:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Nice job, article all checks out and meets the criteria. I'm a big fan of the webcite service - takes the worry out of the equation when you're writing an article that there are only a couple of citations available for! :) Miyagawa (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)